Use case · Law firms

Contract analysis and abstraction

Key terms out of a contract set, with every value traceable to its clause.

The problem

A client sends four hundred agreements and asks what is in them. The work is done by associates reading, and the answer arrives after the deadline that made it useful.

How we would run it

  1. STAGE 1

    Evidence

    A written picture of the current state, with its gaps named.

    Take a representative slice of the contract set, including the badly scanned ones. Agree the fields that matter with the partner who will sign the output.

  2. STAGE 2

    Baseline

    A baseline measurement both sides agree on.

    Have the team abstract a subset by hand. That is both the quality bar and the comparison — without it, there is nothing to prove later.

  3. STAGE 3

    Design

    A design your architecture and risk leads have approved.

    Design extraction per field with confidence thresholds, and decide which fields always get human confirmation regardless of confidence.

  4. STAGE 4

    Ship

    Working software or a live process, in production.

    Run the set with every value linked to the clause it came from, so review is verification rather than re-reading.

  5. STAGE 5

    Prove

    A result measured against the baseline, and an instrument you keep.

    Report accuracy per field against the hand-abstracted subset, plus review time. Fields that do not clear the bar stay manual.

What you get

  • Field definitions agreed with the signing partner
  • Abstraction output with a citation to the source clause per value
  • Confidence thresholds and the review queue they feed
  • Accuracy report by field, against a hand-abstracted set

What it needs from you

  • A representative sample of the contract set, including poor scans
  • The field list the client actually asked for
  • Associates' time to hand-abstract the comparison subset

Where the human stays

Every value carries a link to its clause, and low-confidence fields queue for confirmation. No abstraction reaches a client without a lawyer approving it.

How we would know it worked

  • Accuracy by field against the hand-abstracted set
  • Review time per agreement
  • Fields that had to stay manual

Where it starts

Starts as a sprint

AI Tooling Reality Check

What you own, what you use, and what the demo did not show.

Sprint details →

Grows into

AI Adoption & Enablement

Get AI into the work your fee earners actually do, with evidence for clients.

Program details →
Start here

Start with one sprint

Two to three weeks, one approver, a deliverable you keep. Tell us the problem and we'll come back within one business day with a scope, a date and a fee.

Scope a sprint →